英语六级历年阅读理解真题？大学英语六级考试2306一卷解析，听力22-25，附真题原文翻译2023年6月，大学英语六级考试一卷，听力22-25题，这题话题本身不难，关于友谊对生活和工作的影响。但是文章的写作风格比较难，作为阅读都有一定的难度，那么，英语六级历年阅读理解真题？一起来了解一下吧。

英语六级阅读真题及答案解析

2018年全国大学英语六级考试阅读理解试题7

Very old people do raise moral problems for almost everyone who comes in contact with them. Their values—this can't be repeated too often—are not necessarily our values. Physical comfort, cleanness and order are not necessarily the most important things. The social services from time to time find themselves faced with a flat with decaying food covered by small worms, and an old person lying alone in bed, taking no notice of the worms. But is it interfering with personal freedom to insist that they go to live with some of their relatives so that they might be taken better care of? Some social workers, the ones who clear up the worms, think we are in danger of carrying this concept of personal freedom to the point where serious risks are being taken with the health and safety of the old.

Indeed, the old can be easily hurt or harmed. The body is like a car, it needs more mechanical maintenance as it gets older. You can carry this comparison right through to the provision of spare parts. But never forget that such operations are painful experiences, however good the results. And at what point should you cease to treat the old body? Is it morally right to try to push off death by pursuing the development of drugs to excite the forgetful old mind and to activate(激活) the old body, knowing that it is designed to die? You cannot ask doctors or scientists to decide, because so long as they can see the technical opportunities, they will feel bound to give them a try, on the principle that while there's life, there's hope.

When you talk to the old people, however, you are forced to the conclusion that whether age is happy or unpleasant depends less on money or on health than it does on your ability to have fun.

1. It is implied in Paragraph 1 that______.

A. very old people enjoy living with their relatives

B. social services have nothing to do with very old people

C. very old people would like to live alone so that they can have more personal freedom

D. very old people are able to keep their rooms very clean

2. Some social workers think that______.

A. health and safety are more important than personal freedom

B. personal freedom is more important than health and safety

C. old people should keep their rooms clean

D. one should not take the risk of dealing with old people

3. In the author's opinion, ______.

A. the human body can't be compared to a car

B. the older a person, the more care he needs

C. too much emphasis has been put on old people's values

D. it is easy to provide spare parts for old people

4. The word "it" in the last paragraph refers to______.

A. the conclusion you have come to B. your talk to the old people

C. whether age is happy or unpleasant D. one's money or one's health

5. The author thinks that______.

A. medical decisions for old people should be left to the doctors

B. old people can enjoy a happy life only if they are very rich

C. the opinion that we should try every means possible to save old people is doubtful

D. it is always morally right to treat old people and push off death

答案：1. C 2. A 3. B 4. C 5. C

四六级英语推荐>>>

历年六级阅读理解真题

Section A选词填空

Directions: In this section, there is a passage with ten blanks. You are required to select one word for each blank from a list of choices given in a word bank following the passage. Read the passage through carefully before making your choices. Each choice in the bank is identified by a letter. Please mark the corresponding letter for each item on ,Answer Street 2 with a single line through the centre. You may not use any of the words in the bank more than once.

Questions 26 to 35 are based on the following passage.

Pursuing a career is an essential part of adolescent development. "The adolescent becomes an adult when he26__________ a real job." To cognitive researchers like Piaget, adulthood meant the beginning of an27__________ .

Piaget argued that once adolescents enter the world of work, their newly acquired ability to form hypotheses allows them to create representations that are too ideal. The28__________ of such ideals, without the tempering of the reality of a job or profession, rapidly leads adolescents to become29__________ of the non-idealistic world and to press for reform in a characteristically adolescent way. Piaget said: "True adaptation to society comes30__________ when the adolescent reformer attempts to put his ideas to work."

Of course, youthful idealism is often courageous, and no one likes to give up dreams. Perhaps, taken31__________ out of context, Piaget's statement seems harsh. What he was32__________ , however, is the way reality can modify idealistic views. Some people refer to such modification as maturity. Piaget argued that attaining and accepting a vocation is one of the best ways to modify idealized views and to mature.

As careers and vocations become less available during times of33__________ , adolescents may be especially hard hit. Such difficult economic times may leave many adolescents34__________ about their roles in society. For this reason, community interventions and government job programs that offer summer and vacation work are not only economically __35__ but also help to stimulate the adolescent's sense of worth.

A. automatically

B. beneficial

C. capturing

D. confused

E. emphasizing

F. entrance

G. excited

H. existence

I. incidentally

J. intolerant

K. occupation

L. promises

M. recession

N. slightly

O. undertakes

Section B段落匹配

Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived. You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2.

Can societies be rich and green?

[A] our economies are to flourish, if global poverty is to be eliminated and if the well-being of the world's people enhanced—not just in this generation but in succeeding generations—we must make sure we take care of the natural environment and resources on which our economic activity depends." That statement comes not, as you might imagine, from a stereotypical tree-hugging, save-the-world greenie (环保主义者), but from Gordon Brown, a politician with a reputation for rigour, thoroughness and above all, caution.

[B] A surprising thing for the man who runs one of the world's most powerful economies to say? Perhaps; though in the run-up to the five-year review of the Millennium (千年的)Goals, he is far from alone. The roots of his speech, given in March at the roundtable meeting of environment and energy ministers from the G20 group of nations, stretch back to 1972, and the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm.

[C] "The protection and improvement of the human environment is a major issue which affects the well-being of peoples and economic development throughout the world," read the final declaration from this gathering, the first of a sequence which would lead to the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992 and the World Development Summit in Johannesburg three years ago.

[D] Hunt through the reports prepared by UN agencies and development groups—many for conferences such as this year's Millennium Goals review—and you will find that the linkage between environmental protection and economic progress is a common thread.

[E] Managing ecosystems sustainably is more profitable than exploiting them, according to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. But finding hard evidence to support the thesis is not so easy. Thoughts turn first to some sort of global statistic, some indicator which would rate the wealth of nations in both economic and environmental terms and show a relationship between the two.

[F] If such an indicator exists, it is well hidden. And on reflection, this is not surprising; the single word "environment" has so many dimensions, and there are so many other factors affecting wealth—such as the oil deposits—that teasing out a simple economy-environment relationship would be almost impossible.

[G] The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, a vast four-year global study which reported its initial conclusions earlier this year, found reasons to believe that managing ecosystems sustainably— working with nature rather than against it—might be less profitable in the short term, but certainly brings long-term rewards.

[H] And the World Resources Institute (WRI) in its World Resources 2005 report, issued at the end of August, produced several such examples from Africa and Asia; it also demonstrated that environmental degradation affects the poor more than the rich, as poorer people derive a much higher proportion of their income directly from the natural resources around them.

[I] But there are also many examples of growing wealth by trashing the environment, in rich and poor parts of the world alike, whether through unregulated mineral extraction, drastic water use for agriculture, slash-and-burn farming, or fossil-fuel-guzzling (大量消耗) transport. Of course, such growth may not persist in the long term—which is what Mr. Brown and the Stockholm declaration were both attempting to point out. Perhaps the best example of boom growth and bust decline is the Grand Banks fishery. For almost five centuries a very large supply of cod (鳕鱼) provided abundant raw material for an industry which at its peak employed about 40,000 people, sustaining entire communities in Newfoundland. Then, abruptly, the cod population collapsed. There were no longer enough fish in the sea for the stock to maintain itself, let alone an industry. More than a decade later, there was no sign of the ecosystem re-building itself. It had, apparently, been fished out of existence; and the once mighty Newfoundland fleet now gropes about frantically for crab on the sea floor.

[J] There is a view that modem humans are inevitably sowing the seeds of a global Grand Banks-style disaster. The idea is that we are taking more out of what you might call the planet's environmental bank balance than it can sustain; we are living beyond our ecological means. One recent study attempted to calculate the extent of this "ecological overshoot of the human economy", and found that we are using 1.2 Earth's-worth of environmental goods and services—the implication being that at some point the debt will be called in, and all those services—the things which the planet does for us for free-will grind to a halt.

[K] Whether this is right, and if so where and when the ecological axe will fall, is hard to determine with any precision—which is why governments and financial institutions are only beginning to bring such risks into their economic calculations. It is also the reason why development agencies are not

united in their view of environmental issues; while some, like the WRI, maintain that environmental progress needs to go hand-in-hand with economic development, others argue that the priority is to build a thriving economy, and then use the wealth created to tackle environmental degradation.

[L] This view assumes that rich societies will invest in environmental care. But is this right? Do things get better or worse as we get richer? Here the Stockholm declaration is ambiguous. "In the developing countries," it says, "most of the environmental problems are caused by under-development." So it is saying that economic development should make for a cleaner world? Not necessarily; "In the industrialized countries, environmental problems are generally related to industrialisation and technological development," it continues. In other words, poor and rich both over-exploit the natural world, but for different reasons. It's simply not true that economic growth will surely make our world cleaner.

[M] Clearly, richer societies are able to provide environmental improvements which lie well beyond the reach of poorer communities. Citizens of wealthy nations demand national parks, clean rivers, clean air and poison-free food They also, however, use far more natural resources—fuel, water (all those baths and golf courses) and building materials.

[N] A case can be made that rich nations export environmental problems, the most graphic example being climate change. As a country's wealth grows, so do its greenhouse gas emissions. The figures available will not be completely accurate. Measuring emissions is not a precise science, particularly when it comes to issues surrounding land use; not all nations have released up-to-date data, and in any case, emissions from some sectors such as aviation are not included in national statistics. But the data is exact enough for a clear trend to be easily discernible. As countries become richer, they produce more greenhouse gases; and the impact of those gases will fall primarily in poor parts of the world.

[O] Wealth is not, of course, the only factor involved. The average Norwegian is better off than the average US citizen, but contributes about half as much to climate change. But could Norway keep its standard of living and yet cut its emissions to Moroccan or even Ethiopian levels? That question, repeated across a dozen environmental issues and across our diverse planet, is what will ultimately determine whether the human race is living beyond its ecological means as it pursues economic revival.

注意：此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。

英语六级答案仔细阅读

仔细阅读

第一篇：Texting LOL

本文选自2013年4月25日TIME的Is Texting Killing the English Language? 作者是John McWhorter。

56. C. It will ruin the written language.

解析：题干问到批评者对短消息的评价，这出现在首段首句。这里批评者哀叹短消息是downfall of the written word(书面文字的衰落)。downfall对应ruin(毁坏、堕落)，written word对应written language。

57. A. It is crafted with specific skills.

解析：题干所问的书面语与口语的区别出现在第二段。本段，作者用两者历史长短的差异引出了两者特点的差异：书面语是出现在口语之后的一种工艺(writing is just a craft that came along later)。下文具体举例，体现了书面语突出句子的技术性(crafting long-winded sentences)。这都对应A选项。

六级真题阅读理解整理

看书不能信仰而无思考，要大胆地提出问题，勤于摘录资料，分析资料，找出其中的相互关系，是做学问的一种方法，下面给大家带来一些关于2019六级阅读原文及参考答案，希望对大家有所帮助。

阅读篇一

Questions 46 to 50 are based on the following passage

Professor Stephen Hawking has warned that the creation of powerfulartificial intelligence (AI) will be “either the best, or the worst thing, everto happen to humanity”, and praised the creation of an academic institutededicated to researching the future of intelligence as “crucial to the future ofour civilization and our species.”

Hawking was speaking at the opening of the Leverhulme Centre for the Futureof Intelligence (LCFI) at Cambridge University, a multi-disciplinary institutethat will attempt to tackle some of the open-ended questions raised by the rapidpace of development in AI research. “We spend a great deal of time studyinghistory,” Hawking said, “which, let’s face it, is mostly the history ofstupidity. So it’s a welcome change that people are studying instead the futureof intelligence.”

While the world-renowned physicist has often been cautious about AI,raising concerns that humanity could be the architect of its own destruction ifit creates a super-intelligence with a will of its own, he was also quick tohighlight the positives that AI research can bring. “The potential benefits ofcreating intelligence are huge,” he said. “We cannot predict what we mightachieve when our own minds are amplified by AI. Perhaps with the tools of thisnew technological revolution, we will be able to undo some of the damage done tothe natural world by the last one – industrialization. And surely we will aim tofinally eradicate disease and poverty. And every aspect of our lives will betransformed. In short, success in creating AI could be the biggest event in thehistory of our civilization.”

Huw Price, the centre’s academic director and the Bertrand Russellprofessor of philosophy at Cambridge University, where Hawking is also anacademic, said that the centre came about partially as a result of theuniversity’s Centre for Existential Risk. That institute examined a wider rangeof potential problems or humanity, while the LCFI has a narrow focus.

AI pioneer Margaret Boden, professor of cognitive science at the Universityof Sussex, praised the progress of such discussions. As recently as 2009, shesaid, the topic wasn’t taken seriously, even among AI researchers. “AI is hugelyexciting,” she said, “but it has limitations, which present grace dangers givenuncritical use.”

The academic community is not alone in warning about the potential dangersof AI as well as the potential benefits. A number of pioneers from thetechnology industry, most famously the entrepreneur Elon Musk, have alsoexpressed their concerns about the damage that a super-intelligent AI could doto humanity.

46. What did Stephen Hawking think of artificial intelligence?

A) It would be vital to the progress of human civilization.

B) It might be a blessing or a disaster in the making.

C) It might present challenges as well as opportunities.

D) It would be a significant expansion of human intelligence.

46. B. It might be a blessing or a disaster in the making.

【定位】根据题干Stephen Hawking think of artificial intelligence定位到第一段第一句

【解析】“either the best, or the worstthing…”，要么是最好的，要么是最坏的，与选项B对应。

英语六级阅读真题

大学英语六级考试的阅读理解采用的是“多项选择”(multiple choice)的形式。多项选择题可分为“题干”和“选项”两个部分。题干是固定的，不可更改，它后面跟有若干个选项可供选择，考生必须从若干个选项中挑选出正确答案。多项选择的选项越多，难度越大。通常，有三项、四项和五项三种。听力理解常用三选一的形式，而五选一的形式一般只在高级别的考试中使用。大学英语六级考试采用的是四选一的形式，即在A B C D四个选项中选出一个正确项。

决定阅读理解难度的另一个因素是错误选项的错误程度。如果错误很明显，一看就明白，那么它的难度就小；但是如果它的内容在文章中出现过，并与题干的问题有一定的关联，那么它就会对正确答案形成一定的干扰。六级考试中的错误选项多是这样的选项，它们都不可能被简单地排除。可以说它们不是错误选项，而是“干扰项”。它可能诱使考生作出错误的选择。如果考生基础不扎实，或者审题不仔细，那就可能选择错误的答案。

按《大学英语六级考试大纲》的要求，考生需要掌握5500个词汇。但是解答阅读理解题目要求考生必须全面灵活地掌握这些词汇。英语中一词多义的现象，词性转换的现象非常多。如bar可能是“酒吧”，可能是一“块”巧克力，可能是“铁窗”、“监狱”，也可能是“沙洲”，或者“法庭”，或者一“小节”乐曲。

以上就是英语六级历年阅读理解真题的全部内容，仔细阅读 第一篇：Texting LOL 本文选自2013年4月25日TIME的Is Texting Killing the English Language? 作者是John McWhorter。56. C. It will ruin the written language.解析：题干问到批评者对短消息的评价，内容来源于互联网，信息真伪需自行辨别。如有侵权请联系删除。