2017六级阅读理解答案？答案: 1.[D][定位]首段末句。 解析:题止中的changed与原文该句中的altered为同义词,可见altered的宾语confidence为答案的关键间,在4个选项中,只有D与confidence有关,为本题答案。那么，2017六级阅读理解答案？一起来了解一下吧。

2017年12月六级真题第一套阅读解析

Smother Love

Every morning,Leanne Brickland and he sister would bicycle to school with the same words ringing in their ears:“watch out crossing the road.Don't speak to strangers”.“Mum would stand at the top of the steps and call that out,”says Brickland,now a primary-school teachet and mother of four from Rotorua,New Zealand.Substitute boxers and thongs for undies(内衣),and the nagging fears that haunt parents haven't really changed.What has altered,dramatically,is the confidence we once had in our children's ability to fling themselves at life without a grown-up holding their hands

Worry-ridden Parents and Stifled Kids

By today'sstandards,the childhood freedoms Brickland took for granted practically verge on parental neglect.Her mother worked,so she and her sister had a key to let themselves in after school and were expected todo their homework and put on the potatoes for dinner.At the family's beach house near Wellington,the two girls,from the age of five or six,would disappear for hours to play in the lakes and sands.

A generation later,Brickland's children are growing up in a world more indulged yet more accustomed to peril.The techno-minded generation of PlayStation kids who can conquer entire armies and rocket through spacecan't even be trusted to cross the street alone.“I worry about the road.I worry about strangers.In some ways I think they're missing out,but I like to be able to see them, to know where they are and what they'redoing.”

Call it smother love,indulged-kid syndrome,parental neurosis(神经症).Even though today's children have the universe at their fingertips thanks to the Internet,their physical boundaries are shrinking at a rapid pace.According to British social scientist Mayer Hillman,a child's play zone has contracted so radically that we're producing the human equivalent of henhouse chickens-plump from lack of exercise and without the flexibility and initiative of freerange kids of the past.The spirit of our times is no longer the resourceful adventurer Tom Sawyer but rather the worry-ridden dad and his stifled only child in Finding Nemo.

In short,child rearing has become an exercise in risk minimization,represented by stories such as the father who refused to allow his daughter on a school picnic to the beach for fear she might drown.While it's natural for a parent to want to protect their children from danger,you have to wonder;Have we gone too far?

Parents Wrap Kids up in Cotton Wool

A study conducted by Paul Tranter,a lecturer in geography at the Australian Defence Force Academy in Canberra,showed that while Australian and New Zealand children had similar smounts of unsupervised freedom,it was far less than German of English kids.For example,only a third of ten-year-olds in Australia and New Zealand were allowed to visit places other than school alone,compared to 80 percent in Germany.

Girls were even more restricted than boys,with parents fearing assault or molestation(骚扰),while traffic dangers were seen as the greatest threat to boys.Bike ownership has doubled in a generation,but“independent mobility”---the ability to roam and explore unsupervised---has radically declined.In Auckland,for example,many primary schools have done away with bicycle racks because the streets are considered too unsafe.And in Christchurch,New Zealand's most bike-friendly city,the number of pupils cycling to school has fallenfrom more than 90 percent in the late 1970s to less than 20 percent.Safely strapped into the family 4x4,children are instead driven from home to the school gate,then off to ballet,soccer or swimming lessons--rarely straying from watchful adult eyes.

In the U.S.Journal of Physical Education,Recreation&Dance,New Jersey assistant principal and hockey coach Bobbie Schultz writes that playing in the street after school with neighbourhood kids--creating their own rules,making their own decisions and settling disputes--was where the real learning took place.“The street was one of the greatest sources of my life skills,”she says.“I don't see‘on-the-street play’anymore.I see adult-organized activities.Parents don't realize what an integral part of character development their children are missing.”

Armoured with bicycle helmets,car seats,“safe”playgrounds and sunscreen,children are getting the messageloud and clear that the world is full or peril--and that they're ill-equipped to handle it alone.Yet research consistently shows young people are much more capable than we think,says professor Anne Smith,directorof New Zealand's Children's Issues Centre.“The thing that many adults have difficulty with is that children can't learn to be grown-up if they're excluded and protected all the time.”

Educational psychologist Paul Prangley reckons it's about time the kid gloves came off.He believes parenting has taken on a paranoid(患妄想狂的)edge that's creating a generation of naive,insecure youngsters whoare subconsciously being taught they're incapable of handing things by themselves.“Flexibility and the ability to resist pressure and temptation are learned skills,”Prangley explains.“If you wrap kids up in cotton wool and don't give them the opportunity to take risks,they're less equipped to make responsible decisions later in life.”

Parents Should Gain Proper Perspective

Sadly,high-profile cases of children being kidnapped and murdered--such as ten-year-old Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in the United Kingdom;five-year-old Chloe Hoson in Australia,whose body was found just 200 metres from where she lived;and six-year-old Teresa Cormack in New Zealand,who was snatched off the street on her way to school--only serve to reinforce parents'fears.Teresa Cormack's death,for example,was one of the rare New Zealand cases of random child kidnap.In Australia,the odds of someone under the age of 15 being murdered by a stranger have been estimated at one in four million.A child is at far greater risk from afamily member or someone they know.

However,parental fear is contagious.In one British study,far more children feared an attack by a stranger than being hit by a car.“We are losing our sense of perspective,”write Jan Parker and Jan Stimpson in their parenting book,Raising Happy Children.“Every parent has to negotiate their own route between equipping children with the skills they need to stay safe and not restricting or terrifying them unnecessarily in the process.”

Dr.Claire Freeman,a planning expert at the University of Otago,points to the erosion of community responsibility as another casualty of that mutual distrust.Not so long ago,adults knew all the local kids and werethe informal guardians of the neighbourhood.“Now,particularly if you are a man,you may hesitate to offer help to a lost child for fear your motives might be questioned.”

More Space and More Attention to Kid's Needs

As a planner in the mid-1990s,Freeman became concerned about the loss of green space to development and the erosion of informal places to play.In a study that looked at how children in the British city of Leeds spent their summer holidays,compared with their parents' childhood experiences,she found the freedom to explore had been severely contracted--in some cases,down to the front yard.Freeman says she cannot remember being inside the house as a child,or being alone.Growing up was about being part of a group.Now a mother offour,Freeman believes the “domestication of play”is robbing kids of their sense of belonging within a society.

Nevertheless,Freeman says children's needs are starting to get more emphasis.In the Netherlands,child-friendly “home zones”have been created where priority is given to pedestrians,rather than cars.And ponds arebeing incorporated back into housing estates on the principle that children should learn to be safe aroundwater,rather than be surrounded by a barren landscape.After all ,as one of the smarter fosh says in Finding Nemo there's one problem with nothing ever will.

1.According to Brickland,parents nowadays have changed their____________.

A)standards of the children's proper dressing

B)worry about the children's personal safety

C)ways to communicate with children

D)confidence in the children's ability

2.When Brickland and her sister were little,they kept the home key because_____________.

A)they wanted to be trusted

B)their mother had to work

C)their mother didn't live at home

D)they were very naughty and wild

3.Mayer Hillman indicates that children now have less and less_____________.

A)space for playing

B)contact with animals

C)concern about others

D)knowledge about nature

4.Paul Tranter finds that eighty percent of the children were allowed to visit places other than school alone in_____________.

A)Australia

B)New Zealand

C)Germany

D)Britain

5.What is ranked by parents as the greatest threat to boys?

A)Gang crimes.

B)Online games.

C)Extreme sports.

D)Dangerous traffics.

6.Bobbie Schultz points out that real learning takes place in______________.

A)on-the-street play

B)adult-organized activities

C)student-centered teaching

D)home and nature

7.What accident had happened to a little girl called Chloe Hoson?

A)She was robbed on her way to school.

B)She was kidnapped and murdered.

C)She fell a victim to domestic violence.

D)She disappeared for no reason.

8.Claire Freeman thinks that lack of mutual trust results in__________________.

9.Freeman concludes that kids are robbed of their sense of belonging to the society by___________________.

10.Netherlands has placed the rights of pedestrians before those of cars in such areas called____________.

答案：

1.[D][定位]首段末句。

英语阅读理解及答案

2017年12月六级考试已经结束，许多考生都在等待着分数的发布。但是很多考生都会疑惑，这次六级难度究竟如何呢？下面我们来详细解析一下。

首先，从听力部分来看，整体难度偏难。有不少考生反映此次听力的选择题难度较大，句型也更加复杂。而且考察内容也比较宽泛，有关于医疗、国际合作、电影、科技等方面的材料。所以需要在平时的学习中多积累一些专业词汇和阅读听力材料。

其次，阅读部分难度适中，但是真正考验了学生的阅读速度和理解能力。其中有些文章的词汇比较奇怪，需要借助上下文来理解单词的意思。总体来说，阅读部分考察的知识点比较广泛，涵盖了环境保护、教育、医学、历史、文化、地理等方面，所以需要同学们提前进行各方面的预备工作，进行广泛的知识储备。

第三，翻译部分难度也比较大。这次的翻译涉及到了文化、历史和地理等方面的内容。难点在于翻译的时候需要根据具体的语境进行翻译，不能够照搬原文，否则就会出现语意偏差或者翻译不准确的情况。因此，在平时的学习中应该注重国际时事和文化，提升综合素质。

最后，写作部分考察的是高级语言表达能力和批判性思维能力。此次的写作材料为两篇文章，一篇还是比较传统的习惯性文化类，一篇是关于亚马逊公司的发展。

2017年12月四级阅读理解

六级满分及各部分分数如下：

一、六级分数：

满分是710分；英语六级各个部分的满分是作文满分106.5分，听力部分满分248.5分，阅读理解满分248.5分，翻译部分满分是106.5分。

二、具体分值：

1、英语六级作文：作文写作部分占总分15% ，即106.5分。

2、听力部分：

听力部分的分数是248.5分；听力部分占整套试题的35%，每个题都是7.1分。

（1）长对话占8%，有8个题目 每小题7.1分。

（2）听力篇章占7%，共7小题，每小题7.1分。

（3）讲话、报道、讲座 占20% ，共10个小题，每小题14.2分。

3、阅读理解：阅读理解部分占总分的35%，即248.5分。

4、翻译部分：汉译英占15%，即106.5分；段落翻译答题时间30分钟。

以上数据出自聚优网。

六级考试技巧：

1、词汇的积累和熟练：

词汇是参加任何英语考试的基础，特别是作为全国大学英语级别考试中初级水平的六级考试。其实对于六级大纲词汇所要求的4700个单词，没必要全部都记，要坚持两个原则：去掉已经掌握的单词，重点记忆核心词。

2、在阅读中掌握语法：

用真题来掌握语法，通过精读阅读文章，把阅读文章中出现的语法句型全部吃透然后掌握，这个过程是很费时间的，使用巨微英语《六级真题逐句精解》，里面特别好的一点是，6套逐句精解一句一句分析句子语法结构。

2017英语四级阅读理解

1、六级通过率一般多少

大学英语六级通过率只有30%左右，大学英语六级通过率是不高的，还是比较有难度的。

大学英语六级通过率是不高的，还是比较有难度的。据调查数据显示：2017年6月考试参与六级考试难度调查的3034名网友中，67.6%认为六级考试难度增加。连续几年英语六级上425分的只有30%左右，六级平均四、五个本科生里面有一个能通过。

2、英语六级难在哪里

英语六级题型有听力、阅读、翻译和写作等四大题型，对于每个人来说，各个题型的复习难度都是不同的。那么英语六级到底难在哪里?大家要根据自身的实际情况，调整自己的复习计划，针对有难度的题型多加复习。

客观上来说，这四大题型之中，英语六级考试听力题型的难度还是比较大的。尤其是英语六级改革之后，听力部分题型去掉了短对话和复合式听写，增加了讲座/讲话，总体来说难度趋向于雅思、托福，故而其难度有所上升，所以大家在考试复习中，应该倍加关注此题型，从而提升自己的英语六级通过率。

3、六级425分算过吗

全国大学英语六级考试改革之后，报道成绩满分为710分，写作部分106.5分 ，听力部分248.5分，阅读理解部分248.5分，翻译部分106.5分。

凡考试成绩在220分以上的考生，由全国大学英语四六级考试委员会发给成绩单，不设及格线。

阅读真题答案

为您整理了“2017年12月全国大学英语六级阅读真题二”，希望对您有所帮助!在这里提前预祝考生们都能取得好成绩!

2017年12月全国大学英语六级阅读真题二

Section c

Directions: there are 2 passages in this section. each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements for each of them there are four choices marked a, b, c)and D) You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.

Passage one

Questions 46 to 50 are based on the following passage.

In the beginning of the movie, robot, a robot has to decide whom to save after two cars plunge into the water-del spooner or a child. even though spooner screams"save her save her! "the robot rescues him because it calculates that he has a 45 percent chance of survival compared to sarah's 11 percent. the robot's decision and its calculated approach raise an important question:

would humans make the same choice? and which choice would we want our robotic counterparts to make?

Isaac asimov evaded the whole notion of morality in devising his three laws of robotics, which hold that 1. robots cannot harm humans or allow humans to come to harm; 2. robots must obey humans, except where the order would conflict with law i; and 3. robots must act in self-preservation, unless doing so conflicts with laws i or 2. these laws are programmed into asimov's robots-they don' t have to think, judge, or value. they don't have to like humans or believe that wrong or bad. they simply don't do it.

The robot who rescues spooner s life in / robot follows asimov's zeroth law: robots cannot harm humanity(as opposed to individual humansor allow humanity to come to harm--an expansion of the first law that allows robots to determine what's in the greater good. under the first law,a robot could not harm a dangerous gunman, but under the zeroth law, a robot could kill the gunman to save others.

Whether it's possible to program a robot with safeguards such as asimov's laws is debatable a word such as"harm"is vague (what about emotional harm is replacing a human employ harm), and abstract concepts present coding problems. the robots in asimov's fiction expose complications and loopholes in the three laws, and even when the laws work, robots still have to assess situation.

Assessing situations can be complicated. a robot has to identify the players, conditions, and possibe outcomes for various scenarios,Its doubtful that a computer program can do that-aleast, not without some undesirable results. a roboticist at the bristol robotics laboratory programmed a robot to save hur

oxies(5) called""from danger. when one h-boheaded for danger, the robot successfully pushed it out of the way. but when two h-bots became percent of the time, unable to decide which to save and letting them both"die. "the experiment highlights the importance of morality without it, how can a robot

decide whom to save or what's best for humanity, especially if it can't calculate survival odds?

46. what question does the example in the movie raise?

a) whether robots can reach better decisions

b) whether robots follow asimov's zero"

d) how robots should be programmed.

47. what does the author think of asimovs three laws of robotics?

a) they are apparently divorced from reality.

b)they did not follow the coding system of robotics.

c)they laid a solid foundation for robotics.

d) they did not take moral issues into consideration.

48. what does the author say about asimov's robots?

a they know what is good or bad for human beings

b)they are programmed not to hurt human begings

c)they perform duties in their owners'best interest.

d)they stop working when a moral issue is involved.

49. what does the author want to say by mentioning the word"harm"in asimov's laws?

a)abstract concepts are hard to program.

b) it is hard for robots to make decisions

c) robots may do harm in certain situations

d) asimov's laws use too many vague terms

50. what has the roboticist at the bristol robotics laboratory found in his experiment.

a)robots can be made as intelligent as human begings some day

b) robots can have moral issues encoded into their program

c)robots can have trouble making decisions in complex scenarion.

d)robots can be programmed to perceive potential perils.

以上就是2017六级阅读理解答案的全部内容，满分是710分；英语六级各个部分的满分是作文满分106.5分，听力部分满分248.5分，阅读理解满分248.5分，翻译部分满分是106.5分。二、具体分值：1、英语六级作文：作文写作部分占总分15% ，即106.5分。2、听力部分：听力部分的分数是248.5分；听力部分占整套试题的35%，每个题都是7.1分。内容来源于互联网，信息真伪需自行辨别。如有侵权请联系删除。