2012年考研英语一阅读答案解析，2020考研英语一答案
2012年考研英语一阅读答案解析？2012年研究生入学考试英语一的翻译文章出自美国杂志《Nature》,题目是Universal Truths。这篇文章的理论性比较强,对于大家来说应该会感觉很有难度,大家首先要理解文章大意,依据专业性来定词义。那么，2012年考研英语一阅读答案解析？一起来了解一下吧。
考研政治真题2011
Section I Use of English
1.【答案】B
【解析】从空后的句子“他们解放的人们”可以看出，空前的句子表示的应该是参加了第二次大战的男人和女人。只有serve有“服兵役”的意思，所以选B。其他都不符合题意。
2.【答案】B
【解析】空内信息应该是与hero“英雄”意思相对，后面的分句说他背井离乡，经历了很多苦难，显然这里应该是说由普通人平凡人(common man)成长为英雄，所以选B。
3.【答案】A
【解析】本题考查的是词语的搭配关系，承担战争带来的负担，应该用动词bear或shoulder，所以这里选A，bore。
4.【答案】A
【解析】necessities表示“生活必需品”，空外信息food和shelter(食物和住宿)这些就是维持生存最起码的条件。Facilities是设备设施，commodities商品，properties财产，均不符合题意。
5.【答案】C
【解析】not…but，“不是，而是”表转折，不是自愿兵，也没有高的报酬，而是一个普通人。所以选C。
6.【答案】D
【解析】这道题主要考查介词的搭配。根据up______(the best trained, bestequipped, fiercest, most brutal).enemies可以知道是起来反抗敌人，所以选D选项against。
2020考研英语一答案
2012年考研英语翻译试题的特点表现在以下三个方面：1. 五个句子超纲或较难的词汇较多；2. 句子结构有些太复杂，有一些特别难分析的句子；3. 话题也是广大考生不太熟悉的话题。2012年研究生入学考试英语一的翻译文章出自美国杂志《Nature》，题目是Universal Truths。这篇文章的理论性比较强，对于大家来说应该会感觉很有难度，大家首先要理解文章大意，依据专业性来定词义。比如empirical approach(经验主义方法)，因此难度是近三年最难的翻译文章，也是这次考试大家最感到吃力的试题部分。总体而言，今年的翻译试题感觉是“难懂难翻”。
我在今年冲刺班上反复强调的翻译必考的句子成分，尤其是后置定语，比如50题的strong co-dependencies between particular types of word-order relations，属于我冲刺班提到的必考的名词短语的现象，以及一些常用从句的翻译，比如49题的两个后置定语which are considered to represent biases that result from cognitive constraints.，属于翻译必考的从句。
2012英语1考研阅读答案
《英语历年真题》百度网盘资源免费下载
链接: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1zTgQ0fHFttSWx0qggV99HA
【英语历年真题】|2010~2018考研英语真题（英语一）|2010~2018考研英语真题（英语二）|2018-考研英语二真题答案.pdf|2018-考研英语二真题.pdf|2017 - 考研英语二真题答案.pdf|2017 - 考研英语二真题.pdf|2016 - 考研英语二真题答案.pdf|2016 - 考研英语二真题.pdf|2015 - 考研英语二真题答案.pdf|2015 - 考研英语二真题.pdf|2014 - 考研英语二真题答案.pdf|2014 - 考研英语二真题.pdf|2013 - 考研英语二真题答案.pdf|2013 - 考研英语二真题.pdf
2020考研英语一阅读答案
Come on -Everybody’s doing it. That whispered message, half invitation and half forcing, is what most of us think of when we hear the words peer pressure. It usually leads to no good-drinking, drugs and casual sex. But in her new book Join the Club, Tina Rosenberg contends that peer pressure can also be a positive force through what she calls the social cure, in which organizations and officials use the power of group dynamics to help individuals improve their lives and possibly the word.
Rosenberg, the recipient of a Pulitzer Prize, offers a host of example of the social cure in action: In South Carolina, a state-sponsored antismoking program called Rage Against the Haze sets out to make cigarettes uncool. In South Africa, an HIV-prevention initiative known as LoveLife recruits young people to promote safe sex among their peers.
The idea seems promising，and Rosenberg is a perceptive observer. Her critique of the lameness of many pubic-health campaigns is spot-on: they fail to mobilize peer pressure for healthy habits, and they demonstrate a seriously flawed understanding of psychology.” Dare to be different, please don’t smoke!” pleads one billboard campaign aimed at reducing smoking among teenagers-teenagers, who desire nothing more than fitting in. Rosenberg argues convincingly that public-health advocates ought to take a page from advertisers, so skilled at applying peer pressure.
But on the general effectiveness of the social cure, Rosenberg is less persuasive. Join the Club is filled with too much irrelevant detail and not enough exploration of the social and biological factors that make peer pressure so powerful. The most glaring flaw of the social cure as it’s presented here is that it doesn’t work very well for very long. Rage Against the Haze failed once state funding was cut. Evidence that the LoveLife program produces lasting changes is limited and mixed.
There’s no doubt that our peer groups exert enormous influence on our behavior. An emerging body of research shows that positive health habits-as well as negative ones-spread through networks of friends via social communication. This is a subtle form of peer pressure: we unconsciously imitate the behavior we see every day.
Far less certain, however, is how successfully experts and bureaucrats can select our peer groups and steer their activities in virtuous directions. It’s like the teacher who breaks up the troublemakers in the back row by pairing them with better-behaved classmates. The tactic never really works. And that’s the problem with a social cure engineered from the outside: in the real world, as in school, we insist on choosing our own friends.
21. According to the first paragraph, peer pressure often emerges as
[A] a supplement to the social cure
[B] a stimulus to group dynamics
[C] an obstacle to school progress
[D] a cause of undesirable behaviors
22. Rosenberg holds that public advocates should
[A] recruit professional advertisers
[B] learn from advertisers’ experience
[C] stay away from commercial advertisers
[D] recognize the limitations of advertisements
23. In the author’s view, Rosenberg’s book fails to
[A] adequately probe social and biological factors
[B] effectively evade the flaws of the social cure
[C] illustrate the functions of state funding
[D]produce a long-lasting social effect
24. Paragraph 5shows that our imitation of behaviors
[A] is harmful to our networks of friends
[B] will mislead behavioral studies
[C] occurs without our realizing it
[D] can produce negative health habits
25. The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure is
[A] harmful
[B] desirable
[C] profound
[D] questionable
2024年考研英语一真题及答案
Unfortunately, L.A.Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.(2012年阅读Text 1)
相信大家看到这句话，第一反应就是太难了，若要分析句子结构的话，又会感觉无从下手。首先，我们来解决这句话里出现的生词，L.A.Unified洛杉矶联合学区，inflexible僵化的、缺乏弹性的，mandate命令、指示，with the exception of 除……之外，academic grade学业成绩。
其次我们来给这句话划分结构，将其划分成几个更小的部分来处理。当然断句并不能随心所欲，而是得按照英语的行文规则，在这一步我们可以找标志，其中存在的非常天然的一个标志即是标点，然后连词，最后短语，因此在划分时优先考虑标点符号、连词或者短语。并且断句还需要满足一个长度适中、结构完整的原则，因为长度适中帮助我们较轻松的理解句子，结构完整帮助我们正确的理解。
以上就是2012年考研英语一阅读答案解析的全部内容，2012年考研英语一答案是没有误的，原因是考研英语在考试中是比较规范化和正式化的，对英语考研试题是经过专家组多次核实的，所以，2012年考研英语一答案是没有误的。内容来源于互联网，信息真伪需自行辨别。如有侵权请联系删除。
