2010考研阅读？根据考试大纲要求和历年真题解析可以看出,考研阅读理解最常考的题型分别有:词汇含义题、主旨标题题、细节事实题、推理判断题、功能举例题、态度倾向题。 接下来我就扣紧这六种题型进行解题技巧的分析,并分别举出近两年的真题进行讲解。那么，2010考研阅读？一起来了解一下吧。

2010英语一答案精解

根据考试大纲要求和历年真题解析可以看出，考研阅读理解最常考的题型分别有：词汇含义题、主旨标题题、细节事实题、推理判断题、功能举例题、态度倾向题。

接下来我就扣紧这六种题型进行解题技巧的分析，并分别举出近两年的真题进行讲解。

燃大并词汇含义题

这是每年的必考题。其实质考查的并不是词汇量，而是考生在上下文语境下解析出词汇含义的能力，因此主要是上下文理解的能力。这种题型不需要全文定位，答案往往就在出题句旁边的三句话内。

我们将上下文的关系进行简单的解析，分成顺接和逆接两类。也就是说，如果这三句话内并没有出现任何的对比和转折，我们可以认为前后内容是一致的，逻辑是连贯的，那么划线部分的词义和前后是相同或相似的关系，它的意思可以通过前后两句得出。

如果中间出现了对比转折词，比如but, however, yet, nevertheless, instead of, in spite of, though, although, in contrast, while, on the contrary等，那么前后的关系就是相反或相对的。

(06-01)In spite of “endless talk of difference”，American society is an amazing machine for homogenizing people. There is “the democratizing uniformity of dress and discourse，and the casualness and absence of deference” characteristic of popular culture. People are absorbed into “a culture of consumption” launched by the 19th——century department stores that offered “vast arrays of goods in an elegant atmosphere。

2010考研英语一阅读及答案

vast body of = many

save to = except to 这是save的介词意思

英语一2010阅读

新大纲终于出来了，现根据《2010考研英语大纲解析》，通过与往年考研英语大纲的比对，考研英语阅读的部分从2006年起，《全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语考试大纲(非英语专业)》在2005年大纲增加了阅读新题型，共包括四种题型：1、给标题找段落；2、给段落找标题、3、段落排序；4、七选五段落排序。主要考查考生对诸如连贯性、一致性等语段特征以及文章结构的理解，对考生在语言技能方面的具体要求是能“理解文章的总体结构以及上下文之间的关系”、“区分论点和论据”、“信息匹配”“概括大意”等能力。每次考试从这四种备选题型中选择一种进行考查。新大纲的变化，从一定程度上说明教育部对硕士研究生考试的重视和改革完善硕士研究生考试的决心，也反映了英语测试逐步由应试型向应用型转变。新增备选题型在很大程度上对传统的测试题型进行了必要的补充完善，不仅立足考核考生对语言知识的掌握，而且更加侧重考核考生对语言知识应用的技能。只有真正读懂文章才能够拿到高分，所以测试更为合理。

总的来讲，解答这四类新题型的方法或技巧主要包括：

1、了解文章主要的四框架结构；

2、四种题型四种思路；

3、快速总结段落大意；

4、紧抓段落之间、段落与文章主旨六大关联特征；

下面对文章基本森芹框架作介绍，在是阅读训练中不断调整思路，有效把握篇章主旨和逻辑：

(一)提出问题+分析问题+解决问题

这类文章通常是叙述性说明文。

2010考研英语一阅读及答案评论次数

Text 1

Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.(T1)

It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most bit-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.

We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War 2,at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business. and even those reviews who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were a out. These men believed in journalism as a calling , and were proud to be published in the daily press. 'So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,' Newman wrote, "that I am tempted to define "journalism" as "a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are".'

Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cardus, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays on the game of cricket. During his lifetime, though, he was also one of England's foremost classical-music critics, and a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography (1947) became a best-seller. He was knighted in 1967,the first music critic to be so honored. Yet only one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.

Is there any chance that Cardus's criticism will enjoy a revival? The prospect seems remote. Journalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern readers have little use for the richly uphostered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong retreat.

21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 that

A arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers.

B English-language newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.

C high-quality newspapers retain a large body of readers.

D young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.

22. Newspaper reviews in England before World War 2 were characterized by

A free themes.

B casual style.

C elaborate layout.

D radical viewpoints.

23. Which of the following would shaw and Newman most probably agree on?

A It is writers' duty to fulfill journalistic goals.

B It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.

C Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.

D Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.

24. What can be learned about Cardus according to the last two paragraphs?

A His music criticism may not appeal to readers today.

B His reputation as a music critic has long been in dispute.

C His style caters largely to modern specialists.

D His writings fail to follow the amateur tradition.

25. What would be the best title for the text?

A Newspapers of the Good Old Days

B The Lost Horizon in Newspapers

C Mournful Decline of Journalism

D Prominent Critics in Memory

2010考研英语一阅读翻译

Yet only one of his books is now in print,and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists=还仅有的他的方面的书之一是现在在印刷中和枣神他的在音乐上的作品的大量躯体是除了对专家以外不知名。

他音乐方面的大量作品隐李除专业人士灶岩迟之外,无人知晓=Except special field personage, nobody is aware of large amount of work of his music aspect.

以上就是2010考研阅读的全部内容，新大纲终于出来了,现根据《2010考研英语大纲解析》,通过与往年考研英语大纲的比对,考研英语阅读的部分从2006年起,《全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语考试大纲(非英语专业)》在2005年大纲增加了阅读新题型,共包括四种题型:1、内容来源于互联网，信息真伪需自行辨别。如有侵权请联系删除。